論民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán).pdf

1、論民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)內(nèi)容摘要我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)抗訴中的調(diào)查權(quán)一直以來(lái)備受關(guān)注，在檢察實(shí)務(wù)部門(mén)和審判實(shí)務(wù)部門(mén)之間也存在不同的認(rèn)識(shí)和看法。為了強(qiáng)化對(duì)民事審判活動(dòng)的監(jiān)督，2012年修改的《民事訴訟法》明確規(guī)定，檢察機(jī)關(guān)在履行法律監(jiān)督職責(zé)時(shí)，因提出檢察建議或者抗訴的需要，對(duì)當(dāng)事人或者案外人可以進(jìn)行有關(guān)情況的調(diào)查。但是，對(duì)檢察機(jī)關(guān)履行抗訴職責(zé)時(shí)行使調(diào)查權(quán)的原則、方式、范圍、保障、程序等，依然沒(méi)有明確規(guī)定。筆者認(rèn)為，在新法適用的過(guò)程中，為更好地利用法律賦予的

2、職權(quán)強(qiáng)化法律監(jiān)督的目的，有必要對(duì)民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)制度的框架進(jìn)行進(jìn)一步完善，進(jìn)而形成一套具有操作性和規(guī)范化的抗訴調(diào)查機(jī)制。本文正文圍繞民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)制度，從四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述：首先從民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的概念性質(zhì)入手，通過(guò)定義和法律屬性來(lái)理解民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的概念，確定抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)的性質(zhì)是檢察權(quán)的一項(xiàng)權(quán)能，是實(shí)現(xiàn)法律監(jiān)督的手段；并有針對(duì)性地將民事抗訴調(diào)查權(quán)與檢察權(quán)、偵查權(quán)、初查權(quán)進(jìn)行比較。在分析我國(guó)法律監(jiān)督文化背景和檢察制度建立背景的基礎(chǔ)上，理清民事抗

3、訴調(diào)查權(quán)的思想根源和制度根源分別是國(guó)家rightofinvestigationofprotestdutyprinciplemethodscopeproceduressecurityisstillnotclearlydefined.Theauthbelievesthatintheprocessofthelawapplicabletomakebetteruseoflegalpowerstostrengthenlegalsupervision

4、purposesitisnecessarytoinvestigatetherightofcivilprotestsystemframewkwasfurtherimprovedthefmationofasetofinvestigationmechanismofoperationspecificationofprotest.Thistextisontherightofcivilprotestsurveyfromfouraspects:fir

5、ststartingfromtheconceptofpropertyrightofcivilprotestinvestigationbydefiningconceptslegalattributestoundersttherighttoprotestinvestigationtodeterminethenatureoftherightofcivilprotesttheinvestigationisarightoftheprocurati

6、alpowercanistherealizationoflegalsupervisionmeanstocomparethesystemofcivilprotestinvestigationpowerprocuratialpowerinvestigationpowerright.IntheanalysisoflegalsupervisioninChinaculturalbackgroundprocuratialsystemwasestab

7、lishedonthebasisofthebackgroundideologicalrootstherootsystemofcivilprotestrightsclearinvestigationarenationalismSovietcivilprocuratialsystem.Combinedwiththecurrentscholarsaffirmeddoctrinetoprotesttheinvestigationrightsci

8、vildenialtheythedoctrineofthemeantheyviewpointthereasonstheauthviewsinfavofthedoctrineofthemeantheactualevaluationfromthelegal.Accdingtothetechnicaldefectsexistingincurrentlegislationthecontentisimperfectcontradictysitua

9、tionjudicialpracticeofprocuratialgansusingthepowerofromnessproceduresarenotstardizedthecourtwithlimiteddifficultiesjudicialinterpretationtheauthwillhlethecasebyanalyzingthefmofempiricalinvestigationmeansusesummaryprocura

10、tialpracticetherelativelyhighfrequencycasesituationstudytheuseofthemeritsofthecaseinvestigationindertofindouttheweaknessofthesystem.Finallyaccdingtotheauthsownwkwiththeconceptoflocationsurveyofcivilprotestrightsasthebrea

11、kthroughpointsuggestionsoncrectioninaccdancewithlawconceptlegalreasonablefairpublictheprincipleofthedialecticalunityintheexerciseofrightscleargraspsurveyscopesecuritymechanismrestrictionmechanismstarttheprogramfromstatic